Jury Selection by Zoom Proves To Be Controversial in NJ Criminal Courts
After being closed since March due to the pandemic, New Jersey criminal courts resumed recently when two courts, in Atlantic and Bergen counties, launched two criminal trials.
They used the cases as small-scale trial runs for the start of hybrid jury trials. The term “hybrid” refers to an altered approach, including using technology, to conduct both jury selection and trials themselves, in order to safeguard the health of jurors and court participants in a pandemic.
The judiciary had unveiled a plan in July that it said would allow for safe trials while maintaining the integrity of the system and defendants’ rights.
Atlantic County Jurors to Decide if Pleasantville Woman Committed Forgery
In Atlantic County, 14 jurors were selected according to the plan, to judge a forged check case. They were chosen after one round of juror questions via Zoom and the second round of questions in person within the courthouse. The jurists were to decide whether or not a Pleasantville woman forged or knowingly cashed a fraudulent check for more than $5,000 in Atlantic City on Feb. 15, 2019.
Bergen County Defense Attorneys Obtain a Stay Due to Jury Selection Over the Internet
On the same day as the Atlantic County trial, however, the trial in Bergen County was stayed by an appellate court because of the defense attorney’s objections to a similar jury selection process as was used in Atlantic County—in other words, one that was done partially over the Internet and partially in person. The defense questioned whether the new jury selection process produced a jury pool that represented a cross-section of the community.
In the Bergen County case, a man is accused of scattering gasoline around his estranged wife’s car and house and trying to set them on fire in 2019.
In court filings, his defense attorney argued that the pool of potential jurors in his client’s case consisted mostly of persons under fifty years of age and that people of color were noticeably few in number—-especially compared to the county’s pre-COVID-19 jury pools. The defense attorney said that the jury, as it stood, was 65% white and the majority female.
Exclusion of Certain Demogreaphics and Disproportionate Number of Economically Priveledge Jurors
He also argued that the requirement for jurors to be able to answer questions over the Internet excluded certain demographics. He also claimed that Bergen County’s hybrid jury selection method had selected a disproportionate number of economically-privileged, youthful jurors because they did not have child-care or work conflicts and were technologically fluent.
The judiciary had said in their July announcement that its hybrid jury-selection process will ensure that those without computers or Internet access would not be excluded from jury pools because the court would make technology available to them.
Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Argue that Expediancy is Being Placed Over Consitutional Rights
The court’s plan for hybrid jury trials, like its piloting of virtual grand jury proceedings, has come under fire from legal groups in the state, including the state’s Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Matthew Adams, chair of ACDL-NJ’s pandemic task force, said the court’s hybrid jury selection model “placed expediency over constitutional rights.”
In Bergen County, the jury selection process is now being reviewed by the Appellate Division. It has invited both the ACDL-NJ and the Office of the Public Defender to weigh in.
Atlantic County Case Moved Forward With Precuation Taken by the Court to Keep Everyone Safe
Back in Atlantic County, the trial for the check forgery case did get started. The jurors wore masks and were spread out in the gallery instead of sitting in the jury box. The courtroom was outfitted with plastic barriers.
Two days before the start of that trial, the judge had questioned potential jurors, a process called voir dire, via Zoom. Of those, 44 potential jurors were brought to the courthouse in Mays Landing the following day, and 14 jurors were empaneled after in-person questioning, according to the judiciary.
At the trial, jurors wore clear plastic masks provided by the court and sat apart in the gallery where families and spectators usually sit. Anyone wishing to observe the trial had to watch via a video feed online or in a viewing room at the courthouse, according to a court spokeswoman.
In court, everyone remained masked for the most part, except for the judge, the attorneys while they gave their opening statements from behind barriers, and the witness when she was seated on the stand.
The case unfolded normally after the jurors were sworn in from the gallery, with the prosecutor and the defense attorney giving opening statements.
Witnesses were reminded to speak up because the jurors were farther away than usual, and the stand was wiped down between testimony.
Despite concerns that social distancing would complicate communication between defendants and their attorneys, during the trial, the pair sat side-by-side with masks and spoke to one another, as is typical.
Consult a Passaic County New Jersey Law Firm Attorney Today
At Del Sardo & Montanari, LLC, our experienced team of lawyers supports clients across Wayne, Paterson, Clifton, West Milford, Woodland Park, Little Falls, and Passaic County in all matters regarding defending your rights.
To schedule a consultation with a member of our team today to discuss your case, please call (973) 233-4396 to schedule a free initial consultation with one of our knowledgeable attorneys today.